Flexco Banner LB


E-Newsletter
Aggregates & Roadbuilding Magazine
Subscription Centre
HomeAggregatesRoads / PavingNews / ViewsEducation
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
 
MARKETPLACE
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products

COMMUNITY
Events
Photo of the Week
 
RESOURCES
E-Newsletter
Links
Buyers Guide
Sitemap
 

Joint venture gets lean and green

Calgary Roadbuilde tackles challenges

Written by   
18bA new section of the Calgary ring road demonstrates how today’s road builders are involved with a lot more than just construction in our current environmental, cost and employee climates. The contractor on this project has integrated significant environmental protection measures into project design, initiated aggressive cost controls to combat rising fuel prices and found a new solution to an old labour issue.

Also known as the Northeast Stoney Trail project, the northeast portion of the Calgary ring road is a Public Private Partnership (P3) project valued at $408 million, extending from Deerfoot Trail, the main north-south route through Calgary, around the north east quadrant of the city to 17 Ave. SE. The Alberta government has signed a 30-year contract with the Stoney Trail Group to design, build, operate and partially finance the project in a contract that also includes maintenance of Stoney Trail NW from its junction with Deerfoot Trail to 16th Ave. NW.

The project itself consists of 21 km of new four and six lane highway including 23 bridge structures and interchanges at Deer- foot Trail, Metis Trail, Country Hills Blvd., Airport Trail, McKnight Blvd., and 16th Ave. NE. Construction started in April 2007 and is scheduled for completion in October 2009. Completion levels at the end of April 2008 were about 90 per cent for design, 85 per cent for earthworks, 30 per cent for structures and 5 per cent for roadbase, with paving scheduled to begin later this year. Within the Stoney Trail Group, Stoney Trail Constructors is a joint venture led by the Flatiron Constructors Group, with the Graham Group Ltd. and the Parsons Corporation as partners. The joint venture’s mandate is to design and build the new road.

One could be forgiven for thinking that the location of the new highway would result in easy roadbuilding, at least from a purely construction point of view. After all, the project is routed through relatively flat farmland, with reasonable ground conditions in clay soil apart from a few isolated outcrops of sandstone. On the earthworks side, the road is designed to balance cut and fill quantities, so there are minimal requirements for imported fi ll material. Also, there is no live traffic interaction over most of the new road’s length with the notable exception of its six interchanges.

That first impression is misleading however, as the selected route crosses numerous objects, both man-made and natural, all of which have to be either relocated or integrated into the project design. General superintendent Nestor Soroka reports that utilities crossing or adjacent to the new highway have presented their share of man made challenges. These include the relocation of 6 km of gas pipeline, 1 km of oil pipeline, three electricity transmission pylons and up to 8 km of 138 kV transmission line, as well as several kilometres of electricity distribution line and fibre optic cable.
18b

More significant still, the road alignment crosses numerous existing natural wetlands. Each of these has been assessed by the provincial ministry of the environment and graded on a scale of two to six, according its size and importance as a plant and animal habitat. Under a process known as wetlands compensation, the joint venture is replacing wetlands that are impacted by the project, although the process involves more than a simple one-for-one replacement of old with new. Depending on the assigned grading, the required replacement area may be several times larger than the original wetland and, as a result, some 160 ha of new wetland are being constructed to replace 50 ha of impacted wetland. In other words, more than three times the original wetland area is being replaced. The decision by the joint venture to integrate replacement wetlands into project’s design has added significantly to both the scale and complexity of its earthmoving requirements. For example, new wetlands may be located within the ramps of a new cloverleaf intersection where they will form an important part of the over-all water management regime. In addition, soils removed from existing wetlands require special treatment as they contain the native seed mix essential for creating a new wetland with similar characteristics. All excavated wetland soils are stockpiled separately and individually labelled for subsequent reuse in an appropriate new wetland area.

Battling fuel costs

20Construction manager Dale Gamble ex- plains that the project involves over 10 million m3 of earthmoving of which about 9 million m3 had been completed at the time of Aggregates & Roadbuilding’s visit.

To give some idea of the equipment required to deal with these volumes, some of the bigger mobile pieces on a list running to some 250 items includes 20 Caterpillar 627, 627F, 627G and 637G scrapers, 12 excavators including Caterpillar 320CL to 385 units and an Hitachi EX200LC-2, 21 Caterpillar 735, 740, Volvo A40D and Moxy MT41 articulated dump trucks, six Caterpillar 14H and 16H graders, 12 Caterpillar dozers ranging in size from D6R to D10R, as well as six Caterpillar 815 and 825 soil compactors.

Given the scale of project’s earthmoving quantities and equipment fleet, efficient equipment utilisation is essential, particularly in light of the recent jump in fuel prices. The price of dyed diesel has jumped from 65 cents/litre
to about $1.04 cents/litre in the year since the project began. Over the same time frame, about 9 million litres of fuel have been used site wide, with the majority of that total consumed by the heavy earthmoving fleet. That means the jump in fuel cost has added over $4 million to the contractor’s operating costs which, with no fuel cost indexing system in place, represent a direct addition to overall project cost. In 21bresponse, the joint venture has implemented a number of aggressive cost control measures which, collectively, have virtually offset this increase. Equipment manager Grant Peterson explains that condition servicing will play a key role in the rising costs of operating equipment Condition servicing works on the principle that oil stays in a piece of equipment as long as it can prop- erly do its lubricating job, instead of the traditional practice of replacing oil according to a fixed service interval. Regular oil sampling provides key information on oil condition including its lubricating ability, soot content as well as metal content that gives early warning of possible component failures. Micro filters also have a valuable role here by capturing very fine contaminants that pass through a conventional filter. On this contract, several thousand oil samples have been taken to date, which together with the use of micro filters, have allowed oil life to be maximised. Even when oil changes and other servicing are required, a close watch is being kept on servicing costs, with in-house servicing completed by two lube trucks, three service trucks and five service employees.

The Global Positioning System (GPS), unheard of until the relatively recent past, is another powerful tool available to equipment managers. These systems can be used to monitor almost every aspect of a piece of equipment’s operation, depending on the level of detail required by its owner. Even relatively simple systems provide such information as equipment location, running hours, cycle times, and idle times which can be then compared to shift hours and specific duty to verify overall machine efficiency and fuel consumption. On this project, for example, the monitoring system indicated that earth- moving equipment actually operated more efficiently in very cold conditions. This some-what surprising conclusion makes sense on reflection, as frozen surfaces provide a better running surface and so deliver shorter cycle time than soft muddy conditions.

As a footnote on the topic of monitoring fuel and lubricant costs, Gamble notes that the joint venture’s fuel purchasing policy is also an asset. The joint venture has the freedom to buy fuel from any supplier and, by monitoring the rack prices of fuel suppliers, suppliers can be changed if necessary. Employee solution On the well documented problem of attracting people to the construction business, Gamble confirms that even Alberta is having to deal with an aging workforce and a drop in the number of young applicants: “At the start of the construction season, we used to have twenty or thirty people seeking a career in the construction industry. Now we have just two or three, and our experience is typical. At the provincial level, concern has been expressed that the construction industry simply does not have the necessary human resources available to support Alberta’s continuing growth.”

For Gamble at least however, there is good news on the labour front. The joint venture has been successful in the training and, equally important, retaining of a new sector of the workforce. Once an almost exclusively male work environment, some 20 per cent of the project’s equipment operators are women. As Gamble points out, the cab of a modern articulated dump truck, for instance, is a relatively comfortable work environment with air ride suspension, climate control and low effort controls. Not surprisingly, relatively good pay is also a factor with a current hourly wage rate for the project’s ADT operators of $26 and overtime paid at time and a half after eight hours. These numbers can translate into a solid annual income which compares favourably to other job options, even in an overheated Alberta labour market.